Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

render footways, steps and paths from z14 #668

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

render footways, steps and paths from z14 #668

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor

Rendering from z13 resulted in ugly clutter in fully mapped areas. Rendering of cycleways and bridleways is unchanged, as density of these ways is lower and there is almost no danger of messy clutter.

Many fully mapped areas result at z13 result in terrible mess due to displaying footways, paths and steps. Examples include Cambridge ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.2173/0.1468 ) Berlin ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.5091/13.4464 ), Moscow ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.7676/37.6213 ), Kraków ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/50.0730/19.9556 ), Paris ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/48.8544/2.3571 ).

I am aware that this will make map worse in remote areas and places that have with less important paths and footways unmapped, but overall effect IMHO will be clearly positive.

(fully mapped = further mapping of current state will not change what is rendered by default style)

Example of change, Cambridge currently at z13:

przechwytywanie

and after this change:

przechwytywanie

Rendering from z13 resulted in ugly clutter in fully mapped areas. Rendering of cycleways and bridleways unchanged, as density of these ways is lower and there is almost no danger of messy clutter.
@matthijsmelissen
Copy link
Collaborator

I very much agree with this problem. However, I'm not sure if dropping footway rendering at z13 is the best solution. I also considered doing this, but even though I'd rather see the clutter of footways gone, I think it really introduces too much problems in remote areas. I am currently working on an alternative PR that keeps the footways at z13, but makes them much less visible.

I'd propose not to merge this at least until I have submitted my PR, so we can compare both solutions.

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor Author

I also would be happier with something that looks acceptable at z13 and displays footways. Lets hope that your idea will work.

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor Author

and it is my proposal how to fix #211 @math1985 wants to solve this by implementing #243

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor Author

And Kraków.

przechwytywanie

przechwytywanie

@matthijsmelissen
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed this awaiting my own PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants